Legitimate Government

Why I Love America

Print E-mail
Written by Gen LaGreca   
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 07:57

I love America for being the place where an upstart group of colonists, against all odds, battled the most powerful empire in the world—and won—all in the cause of liberty.

I love America for establishing a revolutionary new country in which a person’s life is his and his alone to live for his own sake, and government’s sole purpose is to protect that sacred right.


Last Updated on Monday, 29 June 2009 11:02
Read more... - Why I Love America
 

Understanding Unalienable Rights

Print E-mail
Written by Freedom Advocates   
Wednesday, 22 April 2009 16:25
Why do we use the term unalienable instead of inalienable? Inalienable rights are subject to changes in the law such as when property rights are given a back seat to emerging environmental law or free speech rights give way to political correctness. In these situations no violation has occurred by way of the application of inalienable rights - a mere change in the law changes the nature of the right. Whereas under the original doctrine of unalienable rights, these rights cannot be abridged.
 
Webster's 1828 dictionary defines unalienable as "not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as in unalienable rights" and inalienable as "cannot be legally or justly alienated or transferred to another." The Declaration of Independence reads: 
“That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights…” 
This means that human beings are imbued with unalienable rights which cannot be altered by law whereas inalienable rights are subject to remaking or revocation in accordance with man-made law. Inalienable rights are subject to changes in the law such as when property rights are given a back seat to emerging environmental law or free speech rights give way to political correctness. In these situations no violation has occurred by way of the application of inalienable rights - a mere change in the law changes the nature of the right. Whereas under the original doctrine of unalienable rights the right to the use and enjoyment of private property cannot be abridged (other than under the doctrine of “nuisance” including pollution of the public water or air or property of another). The policies behind Sustainable Development work to obliterate the recognition of unalienable rights. For instance, Article 29 subsection 3 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights applies the "inalienable rights" concept of human rights: 
“Rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to purposes and principles of the United Nations.” 
Many call for a "Civil Society" which argues for a statutory framework that does not give recognition of the imbued nature of unalienable rights.  

Modern dictionaries blur the difference, as does modern intellectual thought. The modern definition of unalienable is the same as the historical definition of inalienable. The contemporary blurring of the meaning of unalienable and inalienable is evidence of the process of dictionary evolution that Orwell forecasted in “1984.”

Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 08:04
Read more... - Understanding Unalie...
 

Why We MUST Invoke Our Individual Rights—Now

Print E-mail
Written by Genevieve LaGreca   
Wednesday, 03 December 2008 14:48

America today is a nation in trouble. The great fortress of liberty, the country of the most productive, prosperous, and happy people in the world is in grave danger. America is under siege by the Dark Side, the forces of statism, while its Knights of Liberty are disarmed, demoralized, and suffering near-fatal wounds.

The country that once elected leaders whose ideas upheld liberty now elects leaders whose sweet-sounding platitudes and woozy promises are all that is required; and whose actual, dangerous ideas need not be examined until after Election Day.

Last Updated on Friday, 06 February 2009 10:17
Read more... - Why We MUST Invoke O...
 

Restoring the Heart of America: American Crisis Newsletter Part 1

Print E-mail
Written by Clyde Cleveland   
Friday, 07 November 2008 10:20

At the end of 1776 Thomas Paine wrote a series of articles entitled "American Crisis." This series played a critical role in saving the Revolutionary war against the British. Most of the British officers returned home for the winter thinking that the war was over. It was a very bleak time for the colonial army after their humiliating loss in New York. Most of the troops went home for the winter, and those that stayed were freezing and starving. Many defected to the British.

Paine's first letter in the American Crisis series shifted the public awareness, and troops enlisted and people donated essential materials. Paine’s articles made a major impact.

Last Updated on Friday, 06 February 2009 10:22
Read more... - Restoring the Heart ...
 

A Setting Sun?

Print E-mail
Written by Marilyn Taylor   
Thursday, 02 October 2008 11:54
Finally—after the long, hot summer without communiqué, the tension broke as the delegates emerged to publicize the fruition of their exhausting deliberation.  
A lady approached one of the delegates.  “What kind of a country have you given us, Mr. Franklin?” she asked.
In response, Benjamin Franklin replied, “A republic, madame, if you can keep it.”
Last Updated on Friday, 06 February 2009 10:15
Read more... - A Setting Sun?
 

Fully Informed Jurors Need to Know of Jury Nullification

Print E-mail
Written by Iloilo Marguerite Jones   
Friday, 05 September 2008 12:19

Jury Rights Day

September 5, 2008 marked the 338th anniversary of when jurors refused to convict William Penn of violating England's Conventicle Acts, despite clear evidence that he acted illegally by preaching a Quaker sermon. In refusing to convict Penn, the jurors ignored what they knew to be an unjust law. This is known as jury nullification.

Last Updated on Thursday, 25 September 2008 09:18
Read more... - Fully Informed Juror...
 

Happy Birthday, Thomas Jefferson

Print E-mail
Written by Genevieve LaGreca   
Friday, 13 April 2007 07:00

Jefferson fought for a country in which the government had no power to encroach on the mind, the life, the liberty, or the property of the individual. He fought for a country in which the individual was unshackled for the first time in history and could live for the pursuit of his own happiness, instead of being a pawn in the hands of the state.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 June 2008 10:14
Read more... - Happy Birthday, Thom...
 

Declaration of Independence 2007

Print E-mail
Written by Genevieve LaGreca   
Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:00

With a new Congress convening, it’s time to recall the ideals of America as expressed by Thomas Jefferson in the American Declaration of Independence. This expression of the the Declaration is updated to reflect the current usurpations and threats we face. This writing makes an urgent call for our recently elected representatives to fulfill the promise of America envisioned by our Founders and for we, the people, to insist that they do.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 June 2008 10:36
Read more... - Declaration of Indep...
 

Automobility and Freedom

Print E-mail
Written by Sam Kazman   
Friday, 30 September 2005 00:00

Kazman explains that as convenient as driving may be, it is much, much more than that. It is a lovely activity, and a moral activity, and control over it is one of the last things you would want to give up to any government.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 June 2008 11:07
Read more... - Automobility and Fre...
 

The Necessity of Government

Print E-mail
Written by David Kelley   
Tuesday, 12 April 2005 17:35

Political-economic theory in America is increasingly losing its compass. Sustainable Development activists promote policies of unlimited government intervention and many intellectuals promote the opposite side of the political spectrum – anarcho capitalism. This 30 year old essay charts the course for a political-economic theory predicated on reason and logic – the necessity of limited government.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 June 2008 11:18
Read more... - The Necessity of Gov...
 

State Supreme Court Tells Santa Cruz County It’s Not Above the Law

Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 04 August 2004 17:18

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Santa Cruz County government is once again admonished by a high court for abusing citizens.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 June 2008 11:14
Read more... - State Supreme Court ...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

Get Involved! 

Receive Free News and Information 

Sign up now!