Code Enforcement - Don't Come Knocking on My Door
|By Jamie Simone|
|Wednesday, 19 March 2008 04:13|
“Right now we don’t go knocking on doors.” The ambiguity of this statement causes one to seriously question, “When exactly will they be pounding on my door?”
Santa Cruz County,
Distinct groups gathered together to voice their reactions to the proposed ordinance. Sierra Club members proclaimed that property owners obtain government permits (failure to do so should land a citizen in jail, according to one speaker) while pro-Staff citizens wasted everyone’s time by simply stating and re-stating their support for the ordinance. There were others who spoke, very concerned about this ordinance and its threat to property rights.
Tom Burns, Planning Director and his staff proposed a lengthy series of regulations and restrictions having to do with private land usage while claiming to be working toward a less complicated permit system. How can one possibly expect the system to be simpler when there is such a big fuss about whether a work unit should be granted permission to have heating? Other nonsensical complications included the legality of the size of animal enclosures, and the requirement of a permit for structures 18” (inches) tall.
Most shocking about the ordinance is its proposal to allow inspectors onto private land without a warrant, an outright violation of the Constitution’s 4th Amendment rights against unwarranted search and seizure. [See current ordinance already written into county code 13.10.611 Accessory Structures *]
Burns felt it necessary to further clarify the proposal after facing much critique. He reassured the Board that landowners would be notified prior to their inspection.
Burns stated, “Right now we don’t go knocking on doors.” The ambiguity of this statement causes one to seriously question, “When exactly will they be pounding on my door?”A continuation hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for April 15, 2008.
2. As a condition of approval, permits for accessory structures shall provide for inspection as follows:
i. The structure may be inspected for condition compliance twelve months after approval, and at any time thereafter at the discretion of the Planning Director. Construction of or conversion to an accessory structure pursuant to an approved permit shall entitle County employees or agents to enter and inspect the property for such compliance without warrant or other requirement for permission. (Ord. 3632, 3/26/85; 3996, 6/6/89; 4099, 12/11/90; 4496-C, 8/4/98)
See Related article with history of Board hearings and documents Planning Department Bait and Switch
This article is from Freedom Advocates
The link to the story is: http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/private_property/code_enforcement_-_don%27t_come_knocking_on_my_door_20080319287/