Nature Conservancy Under Investigation, Suspends Operations After Post Exposure |
|
|
| By Administrator | |||
| Thursday, 29 May 2003 16:00 | |||
|
SUMMARY: The Nature Conservancy is coming under fire after the
Washington Post described how the $3 billion environmental charity may
have played loose with IRS laws to benefit supporters, including
corporations that have paid millions in environmental fees. This story
provides a comprehensive overview of how your taxes and donations have
been used by The Nature Conservancy, provides links to the Washington
Posts "Big Green" series and to a library of supplementary stories. FULL TEXT: The Nature Conservancy is coming under fire after the Washington Post described how the $3 billion environmental charity may have played loose with IRS laws to benefit supporters, including corporations that have paid millions in environmental fees. Questionable practices In a three-part series, Washington Post Staff Writers Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway detailed questionable practices at the worlds richest environmental group like the following:
Conservancy takes steps to hold off external investigation To shore up its image The Nature Conservancy hired a PR agency and has put outa call for its supporters to write letters to the editor to protest the Post series, the Post reported. In attempt to head off an outside investigation, like the one that the Post reports is brewing in Congress, the Conservancy has hired a team of lawyers. Meanwhile, the Conservancy has suspended all "conservation buyer" transactions until its board of directors can investigate [itself], according to the Post. "Big Green" Series Following is the three part "Big Green" series by Washington Post Staff Writers Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway:
"Big Green" supplementary stories Following are supplementary stories to the "Big Green".
----- In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]
|










